PublisherRevenue Guide

The business behind
independent publishing.

New here? Choose a reading path ↗

Publisher case / Documented public sources

Aftermath ties subscriber goals to operating capacity

A worker-owned games publication publishes approximate thresholds for work it hopes to fund, while its founders describe the hidden labor behind a reader-supported site.

An illustration of the Aftermath team against a pink background.
Publisher illustration currently displayed on Aftermath’s subscriber-goals page. Retrieved 16 September 2026; the page has been updated since its 7 April 2025 publication. The artwork’s creation date is not established. Aftermath ↗

Goals are a planning language

In its April 2025 subscriber-goals post, Aftermath said the article originally went up with 4,350 paying subscribers, compared with 2,850 at the equivalent point a year earlier. The live article has since been updated, so its later progress markers should not be read as the original publication-day count. The post pairs subscriber thresholds with possible additions such as more regular event coverage, specialist help and another full-time role. It explicitly calls the numbers ballpark figures.

That qualification is the case's most useful feature. A subscriber target is a budget hypothesis: if enough people pay and stay, an outlet may be able to add a specific cost. It is not a published claim that each threshold automatically produced the named hire or that all subscribers pay one price. A small publisher could calculate a cautious net contribution per retained subscriber, reserve for tax and overhead, and revisit the threshold whenever cost or product mix changes.

Source notes: Aftermath Vs 2025

Operating the publication is work beyond publishing

In a November 2024 first-year reflection, the five founders described handling account support, legal paperwork, taxes, payments, the merchandise store and social distribution themselves. Some were still working part-time on the publication during 2024. One founder warned that a growing business had not yet grown quickly enough to be a full-time job for most of the team. Those are first-person accounts of their situation, not a payroll statement.

This changes how a reader-funded launch should be costed. An owner may initially perform finance, customer support and marketing without paying a separate invoice; the work still uses scarce hours. A useful runway calculation shows both cash expenses and founder time, then asks which jobs can safely wait and which will fail if nobody owns them. The first-year reflection also makes clear that the capacity to publish at a steady pace is constrained by those unseen tasks.

Source notes: All The Things We've Learned After A Year Of Running Our Own Website

Use milestones without inventing unit economics

Aftermath's thresholds connect reader support to visible editorial and community choices. That can make a request to subscribe more concrete: people can see what additional capacity is being considered. The post also says some earlier goals were moved or removed once their costs and difficulty became clearer. Revising a plan is evidence of budget learning, not a broken promise by itself.

An independent publisher can adopt a similarly candid milestone page, with an update date, a condition for each proposed expense and a distinction between funded, planned and completed work. It should keep a private monthly cash forecast beside the public goals. Aftermath has not disclosed revenue per subscriber, churn, salaries, gross margin or the exact cost of those goals. Its numbers cannot fill another site's spreadsheet; they show a way to explain the connection between payments and work while preserving uncertainty.

Source notes: Aftermath Vs 2025 · All The Things We've Learned After A Year Of Running Our Own Website

Sources & limits

The subscriber-goals page has later updates and approximate thresholds; realized cost, salary, revenue and churn are not disclosed.

  1. Aftermath Vs 2025
    Publisher subscriber goals; live page updated after original publication · Source published 7 April 2025 · Primary source checked · 16 September 2026
  2. All The Things We've Learned After A Year Of Running Our Own Website
    Publisher first-year retrospective · Source published 11 November 2024 · Primary source checked · 16 September 2026

Source claims and editorial judgments remain separate. Send a correction with the passage and supporting evidence.

Keep going

Also on the desk.

Explore the library ↗

A clearer view of the business

The Revenue Letter.

One useful model. One question worth asking.
A considered note for independent publishers.