PublisherRevenue Guide

The business behind
independent publishing.

New here? Choose a reading path ↗

Operating guide / Primary sources + editorial method

Prepare a publisher vendor exit plan before notice is due

An exit plan inventories contractual clocks, portable assets, dependent systems, deletion evidence, and a reversible cutover without pretending that an export is a working replacement.

An open laptop displaying the Unsplash website on a table.
Reference photograph: a digital workspace, not an advertising dashboard. Bernd Dittrich / Unsplash ↗
Open the visual model ↗
An illustrative newsletter ledger: $1,234.56 gross less $445 in named costs and labor leaves $789.56 contribution.
Original editorial diagram / Conceptual illustration; not benchmark data.

Read the exit clock and assign decision rights

Start with the signed agreement and amendments, not the sales page. Record renewal date, notice window, termination route, minimum spend, outstanding invoices or credits, export assistance, data return or deletion language, domain and account ownership, post-termination access, and dispute contact. Put a named internal owner beside each unresolved term. This is an operational inventory for contract and legal review, not contract advice.

UK ICO accountability guidance includes return or deletion at the end of certain processing arrangements, illustrating why exit handling belongs in the original contract. The applicable obligation depends on role and jurisdiction. Ask the responsible reviewer to interpret the actual agreement. Send no notice during planning; the plan should first make the consequences visible and identify the authorized person who can later act.

Exit clock register
ItemEvidenceOwnerDecision date
Renewal and noticeSigned order formBusiness ownerBefore notice window
Export entitlementContract and help pageData ownerBefore access ends
Final invoice/creditBilling ledgerFinance reviewerClose period
Deletion/returnApplicable clausePrivacy reviewerAfter verified cutover

Source notes: Contracts and data sharing

Inventory portable assets and nonportable behavior

List content records, media originals, taxonomies, authorship, URLs and redirects, subscriber or customer records, consent and suppression state, templates, code, configuration, analytics history, billing references, ad tags, API credentials, domains, certificates, and documentation. For each asset, record source of truth, export format, approximate count, stable identifiers, attachments, and who can validate it. Export availability alone does not establish completeness or restorability.

Vendor documentation can reveal boundaries. Ghost, for example, documents different exports for content, members, themes, and analytics. That product-specific fact is a prompt to inspect separate asset classes, not proof that another vendor behaves the same. Also record workflows that cannot be exported: automation logic, deliverability reputation, model output, reporting definitions, historical permissions, and proprietary audience segments. These need replacement decisions, not just files.

Asset portability map
AssetFormat/keyDependencyValidation
ArticlesJSON + stable slugMedia URLsCount and sampled render
MediaOriginal files + pathsStorage/CDNChecksum and sampled open
MembersCSV + internal IDConsent/suppressionCounts by status
RedirectsCSV source→targetRouting layerSample chains and loops
ReportsCSV/PDF + definitionsVendor taxonomyTotals and period

Source notes: Exports

Map dependencies and design a quiet cutover

Draw inbound and outbound dependencies: DNS, single sign-on, webhooks, payment provider, email sender, tag manager, CDN, search, mobile apps, analytics, support forms, and downstream warehouses. Mark which credentials the departing vendor can use and which systems point back to its domains. The exit is not complete while an overlooked webhook can publish, charge, send, or overwrite records.

Define a parallel validation environment and a cutover sequence. Freeze only the data classes that require it, capture a final delta, reconcile counts, switch one dependency at a time, and keep a time-limited rollback path. Prevent test systems from emailing real readers, charging accounts, serving production ads, or writing into the old source of truth. This plan is broader than newsletter migration because it covers the publication's entire vendor dependency graph.

  • Map every domain, credential, API, and webhook.
  • Separate test credentials and recipients.
  • Choose a final-delta method for changing records.
  • Preserve redirects and public identifiers.
  • Define rollback authority and an expiry for the rollback path.

Verify service, evidence, and access before closing

Run count checks and sampled editorial checks on the destination. Verify login, publishing, accessibility, feeds, forms, payments, unsubscribe or suppression behavior, analytics, ad delivery, and error monitoring as applicable. Compare a representative set of old and new URLs. Archive configuration and final reports in publisher-controlled storage with a retention owner.

A vendor-provided archive is not automatically a business-continuity backup. Ghost explicitly distinguishes its service archives from a backup solution for continued service, which is a useful caution even when using another platform. After authorized termination, rotate or revoke credentials, remove webhooks, confirm billing status, document returned or deleted data as required, and retain the evidence. Do not claim the exit succeeded until the publication works and the dependency register is closed.

Source notes: Automatic backups · Contracts and data sharing

Continue the work

Sources & limits

Contract, privacy, tax, and retention duties vary. Use this inventory with the publication's qualified reviewers and actual agreements.

  1. Contracts and data sharing
    UK regulator guidance · Publication date not stated · Primary source checked · 19 September 2026
  2. Exports
    Ghost documentation · Publication date not stated · Primary source checked · 19 September 2026
  3. Automatic backups
    Ghost documentation · Publication date not stated · Primary source checked · 19 September 2026

Source claims and editorial judgments remain separate. Send a correction with the passage and supporting evidence.

Keep going

Also on the desk.

Explore the library ↗

A clearer view of the business

The Revenue Letter.

One useful model. One question worth asking.
A considered note for independent publishers.