RETROSPECTIVE RECORD · PREPARED 16 SEPTEMBER 2026The guide archive · 100 retrospective records ↗
Publisher Revenue Guide

The guide archive / Reader trust & rules

Reader trust & rules / From the guide · November 2019 event · prepared 16 September 2026

A 2019 FTC brochure spells out where a disclosure must appear

The FTC's plain-language 2019 guide for influencers sets concrete placement and wording rules a disclosure must meet.

ftc.govprimary record

Disclosures 101 for Social Media Influencers

Document
1 November 2019
Event
1 November 2019
Retrieved
16 September 2026
No visual was published with this record, so its primary document stands in its place.

The revenue mechanism

In November 2019 FTC staff published Disclosures 101 for Social Media Influencers, a short brochure translating the agency's Endorsement Guides into instructions for people paid, or given free or discounted products, to promote a brand on social media. The mechanism behind it is the one behind most influencer and affiliate income: a brand pays cash, free product, or commission for a recommendation, and its value to the brand depends partly on the audience believing it is unprompted. The brochure is written for the earner rather than the brand, a rare primary document addressed to the income side of the relationship.

What the documents show

The brochure requires disclosure for any financial, employment, personal, or family relationship with a brand, including free or discounted products, even if unasked or believed unbiased. Tags, likes, and pins showing a brand preference are themselves endorsements. A disclosure must sit with the endorsement itself; one placed only on a profile page, or reachable only by clicking further in, is described as likely to be missed. For video, the disclosure should appear in the video itself, not only in a text description, since some viewers watch without sound. The companion Endorsement Guides FAQ, cross-referenced in the brochure, expands on how the agency judges disclosure clarity across platforms.

The assumptions exposed

The brochure is staff guidance, not a rule with independent force of law, and assumes a reader already knows they have a reportable relationship; it does not resolve every edge case, such as long-running ambassador arrangements with irregular gifting. It assumes English-language, US-facing content, though it notes a disclosure should match the endorsement's language and that US law can reach posts made abroad when US consumers are foreseeable. A publisher should not treat its example wording as an exhaustive safe list; other FTC guidance treats vaguer terms as insufficient, implying the real boundary is clarity, not a fixed word list.

What to check before you rely on it

This is an editorial checklist, not legal advice: check that a disclosure sits inside the post, image, or video itself rather than a linked bio or caption tail; check that live and video content repeats or embeds the disclosure rather than relying on one mention; and check that a platform's built-in partnership label supplements, rather than replaces, a clear disclosure in the content.

  • Would a reader scrolling quickly see the disclosure before finishing the post?
  • Is the disclosure worded in plain terms like ad or sponsored rather than an abbreviation a reader might not recognize?
  • Does the disclosure appear in every format the content is republished in, including cross-posted or edited versions?

The brochure's guidance has not been withdrawn or superseded by the 2023 Endorsement Guides revision; the two documents describe the same disclosure duty at different levels of detail.

Sources & reading trail

Disclosures 101 for Social Media Influencers ↗

The FTC staff brochure's own text on when, where, and how a disclosure must appear, dated November 2019 on its final page.

Source published: 1 November 2019 · Retrieved: 16 September 2026

FTC's Endorsement Guides: What People Are Asking ↗

FTC staff FAQ that the brochure itself cross-references for more detailed disclosure-clarity examples.

Source published: Not established · Retrieved: 16 September 2026

Programme terms, standards and reports establish the entry; the assumptions reading is Publisher Revenue Guide editorial analysis. This retrospective draft does not imply the site published on the event date.